Search results

The 2005 Miami team was ranked #3 going into the 2nd to last game of the year. That was a very good team, with possible HOFs on both sides of the ball ( Update on this. Advanced box score gave us a 100% chance to win. There was absolutely no luck involved in this W.

You don't really believe that, right? You're just being a troll? 1) 2017 ex-VT and ex-ND was still BETTER than even the best Shannon/Golden season (73% win pct vs 69%) 2) In college football, 2 games represent 17% of the regular season (and more like 20-25% if you take out the cupcakes). 2...

If you take out Clemson's wins over Notre Dame and Alabama last year, they really didn't have that good a season. They beat up on a weak ACC, but so what? ^This argument is only slightly less ludicrous than your argument. If you take out the two most memorable games - including a primetime...

Almost everything you said there was wrong. Even AFTER the Pitt game, Connelly said we had -1.7 wins of bad luck. And then vs FSU I think we had something like a 95% postgame win expectancy. We'll have to wait until tomorrow for the Lville advanced box score, but given that he had us winning by...

When we were 3-4 the advanced metrics said we were really more like a 4-3 or 5-2 team with bad luck. And now the last 3 weeks the results have finally caught up. With reasonable luck this year we're a 7-3 or 8-2 team. With our schedule, that wouldn't make us world beaters, but it would make...