Search results

If I had to pick one I’d go players. You’ve had Chizik and Orgeron have titles but no team the last few decades hasn’t been loaded with talent. Orgeron did have Brady, and Malzahn+Newtan was a perfect match. It’s from somewhere around 55-60% players the rest coaching, and if you don’t have both...

People are so binary with this argument. It's both.

Searles was somewhere in the middle. Richts scheme was making him look worse and Longo’s is making him look better than he is. Regardless of scheme we saw a lot of things that smelt like poor o line coaching, and his evaluations were horrible.

I don't know what's more perplexing, that they can develop good enough to have that success without NFL players, or how they can't develop OLinemen to the NFL at all. Sounds like they're signing smart guys regardless if they're physically dominant.