Search results

I wasn’t tryna say that wasn’t the case with those all time greats. I’m saying that’s even more of the case now given how multiple offensive schemes are with the ability to threaten all levels of the field at all time. Add in tempo, RPOs, read options and all the other aspects of College...

I’m not saying he didn’t get beat but if surely wasn’t a reoccurring theme. It wasn’t a liability is all I’m saying. Running fast doesn’t make u a better LB in coverage

Nah he didn’t get washed out “a lot” majority of the times he made the play. That’s apart of the position at all levels. It’s not gunna be clean. Manny’s system allows guys to be play makers instead of play absorbers. If you play 55 snaps a game along our Dline thers no reason why you shouldn’t...

All I’ll say is it’s not the 80s, 90s or early 2000s any more. Your LBs need to to be instinctual players who can navigate traffic. Offenses more than likely will always have a numbers advantage in the box these days.

That’s not ideal, but you can’t shy away from it when the oline schemes up to the 2nd level. That’s bound to happen. And in manny’s system it happens a lot. Shaq played through a lot of traffic and made plays around and through blocks

I’ve said this before, the **** that was going on in front of the LBs had a lot to do with how bad they looked. And the Mike was Replacing a AA level player in shaq...personally idk about smith to WSL with no thumper along side him or space eaters up front.

Bruh..when was shaq ever exposed in pass coverage..I need a play a sequence a drive or something..we never asked shaq to drop deep middle in C2 or cover a TE up the seam..

Who?