Search results

What I would agree with is Michigan doesn't have overwhelming talent that wins by default without good coaching. But acknowledging Michigan's DL was better than Bama's this year shouldn't be any harder than acknowledging that Washington's QB and WRs were better than Bama's this year. I think...

Top 10 is an arbitrary cutoff, Michigan classes were still good (47 bluechips on roster) they were not Rice classes but that is besides the point which is that you don't need to assign backward-looking odds or theorycraft re: the question of whether players with game tape are good when you have...

I can't tell if people are trolling, why is everyone talking about recruiting ratings as if they are the same thing as ratings of developed players on a roster that have have played games and been evaluated based on their p5 tape? It's the same logic as finding some 5* QB on Bama's roster and...

Michigan has top talent, they didn't recruit at Bama/UGA level to get there though.

Comparisons for a successful Mario model should be Gene Chizik 2010 and Ed Orgeron 2019, not coaches who are on the all-time list of great coaches. Both those guys had stud QBs, right now we have Hufflepuff.

Michigan is very well-coached but they were also the best line of scrimmage team this year so if people are making odds on how often a team recruiting 13ish is gonna be better on the LOS than Bama and UGA I would say don't expect that to happen very often. Ole Miss next year should be a good...