Search results

My post said you didn’t need top 5 classes. It said you needed over 50 percent blue chip ratio. Clemson had it both times they won the championship. No team in the playoff era has won without it, including Michigan a few days ago.

The CIS argument isn’t an argument because Clemson has won it multiple times without top 5 classes. You have to be over 50 percent, period. And Michigan was. Why are you including 2 teams that lost. Are we trying to get all the way there and lose!? And I don’t know if you realize this but its...

Stop including 2 teams that LOST. Michigan is actually a team that fits the talent composite argument. They had better players than Washington. When team like Iowa wins the ****le holler at me.