Search results

I only read the first two lines...

SHEETZ! @SWFLHurricane is all in with Salter!

NaCl

Check your DMs.

We are talking and pushing our chips into the middle of the table.

$2M is powerful.

Chips pushed in...

K. Oh my god, I screwed up the work!

Implications mean nothing. And, again, you can go through "the complete process" without ever hiring an agent. Whatever happened to the honest, humble ST26, who admitted that he made a mistake?

You are an excellent goalpost-mover. This was you, 10 posts later.

You said it. I pasted it three times now. "Declared for the NFL draft". Not "signs with his agent".

Time-stamping does not support this hypothesis. Plus, wouldn't I have ****ed up at least ONCE and accidentally responded to myself?

Your "original argument" is that because he declared, he was ineligible to return. Except for the fact that a guy who does NOT hire an agent is obviously keeping his options open. Keep spinning. You've been wrong nearly every time you've posted. It's getting comical now, how you try to...

You said it on your 10th attempt to explain the rule. And you still incorrectly insist that the two things are the same. They are not. You can fill out the paperwork to enter the draft without hiring an agent. Lots of guys have done so.

Look up the rule. The rule says "no". There is currently a temporary injunction enjoining the enforcement of the rule, so if he enrolls in January, he will be allowed to bypass the NCAA rule.

No rule. Nothing does. And no brain in your head.

So you'll tell a lie to cover up for all the posts where you insulted me for not knowing about a non-existent rule? But, sure, you don't read 98% of my posts. At least you belatedly admit your fraud.

You read it all. You know you did. That's why you pivoted from citing a non-existent rule to...complaining about the length of my post. You actually know less about the NCAA rules than @ST26 . And I didn't think that was possible. You're worse than Michael Cohen citing non-existent legal cases.