Search results

Not even close

I really hope this is a joke

Nobody is taking it away. Just truthfully looking at the situation and realizing he didn’t actually do anything that wasn’t already happening at that school for the last 20 years. Good for him to not ***** it up. But that’s a far stretch from him supposedly being a “proven program builder”...

The only other decent team in the conference that year DESTROYED Mario twice. 8 win UCLA sucked and lost Fresno. They didn’t beat a single good team all year and we’re so scared to play NC State they cancelled the bowl game lmao 8 win Arizona St wasn’t good. Their best win was against UCLA...

The entire reason for hiring Mario and having faith in him is bc he proved he could do it at Oregon. And that he could build here, what he built out there. In reality what he did and built at Oregon was exactly what everybody before him had done. What I posted negates all of that.

It would’ve been a major red flag if he wasn’t successful there. The PAC 12 was terrible back then. He wasn’t playing the same schedule Lanning is.

Can we stop acting like Mario at Oregon was Howard at Louisville? Like Oregon was a no name school before he got there? He didn’t build it from the ground up. He took over a team that had been winning for a long time. Being bad is an outlier up there in the last two decades. Honestly what did he...