Search results

This program hasn't "regressed" since about 2006. It's the same garbage program. But you think any competent coach would just come in and turn around 20 years of trash by year two. So you would rather have a fake championship run one time? You don't want us to get back to being a yearly contender?

Answer mine first. When Louisville goes backwards next year, are you willing to concede that one-hit wonders aren't the model we're trying to emulate?

10th year senior QB, 1500 rushing yards, and 1000 receiving yards will all be gone next year. Let's see what a mastermind Jeff Brohm is in year two, since it was his coaching that led to success in year one.

So you can pick and choose your examples, but you're not willing to look at college football as a whole. Makes sense. When Louisville goes backwards next year, are you willing to concede that one-hit wonders aren't the model we're trying to emulate?

Sure. They have a veteran quarterback, an elite running back, and a horrendous schedule. But let's not get too excited about year one results. Remember, this very board went on and on about how Lincoln Riley made an impact in year one. Have you checked in on him lately?

Yes, and we needed to do it right away. If we can't beat a top 5 team on the road, bring in a guy who will.

If you want to argue about something other than what I wrote, do it with someone else. You asked where we have made improvements and I answered.

The O-line and the entire defense. Two things to build a program around.

Hope this helps: mas·sive /ˈmasiv/ adjective 1. large and heavy or solid. "a massive rampart of stone" exceptionally large. "massive crowds are expected"

Got it.

No, W/L isn't the only thing that matters. No one snaps their fingers and turns a program around that quickly.

Then be miserable. Doesn't bother me. If you can't see massive improvement and need 8-1 already, that's your issue. We haven't won a **** thing in over two decades.

And 6-6 would be a disappointment. Where is the confusion?

Standards are fine. And most asked for 8-4, which is very much within reach.

Well, I didn't say they're the 4th best team, I said they are the #4 team. Which they are. They have talent and experience and they haven't lost. But we expect to erase 22 years of futility in year two, and we **** near did it.

Nah, not at all. I just have common sense.

Then you're going to fire a lot of coaches if you expect to knock off a top 5 team on the road in year two.

English translation, please.

We just took the #4 team to the last 45 seconds. Get some perspective.