Search results

of course not. and fair point. but what I'm saying is that after even two games, you can't make broad conclusions as to "fault." and some of those "little things" were already in the playbook. ken used them too. and what you might be seeing is difference in reads that direct the ball...

you're right. (Insert Sarcasm): =====> nothing different. by the way, as a I mentioned in another post, I have worked with Kurt at QB camps over the years and respect his knowledge and perspective. I'm not defending Ken, as it would require a deeper dive to form a feel reasoned opinion...

which is interesting. since if you look at the tape, they haven't done anything different since Ken left. feel free to discuss.

it is true. which is why neither one of them will talk to him ever again. and I think the "decided schematic advantage". was self professed. not something the football gods would agree was facts. but no matter. ken's an NFL guy and I expect him to stay there. (until he doesn't).

Not a great comparison. Charlie Weis was a clown who lucked into one of the 2-3 GOATS in NFL QB history. And once he didn't have the Pats defense to give him a lot of latitude in his schematics, and actually had to recruit his own players and coach them up, he blew chunks. Ken is different...

this. thanks @Lance Roffers (mr. sanity of CIS)