Search results

I am not saying A&M is bad, but was replying to a comment that specifically called them and Clemson out like wins over them are why we should be happy with the season. My point was that considering how those teams have looked now that the season is 3/4 over, neither of those wins are big enough...

Maybe this is a better way of putting it... do I think the team is better than last year? Yes. But do I think they are anywhere near they should be for year two? No. It's like taking a class where you need a 70% to pass. The first time you took the class you ended up with a 40%, but you had...

"Ride or and Die"

But we shouldnt even be in the position where we need to pull out wins against the teams we are having to - at least not on a consistent basis

What if they then told you at the time that through 9 games A&M would be 5-4 (3-3 in conference) and Clemson would be 5-4 (2-4 in conference)? Suddenly those wins don't seem as impressive any more. Expectations are allowed to - and should - shift when more information is available.

Him and Mario must be close personal friends. Yeah... the issue with looking strictly at pre-season expectations is it does not take into account new realities (ex: Clemson is not nearly as good as people expected). Also, just looking at a team's record does not take into account how the team...