Search results

The refs have been anti-Cane for a minute. But last night was particularly off in that regard.

It has (more or less) happened to Mario twice in his lifetime. That is the troubling part.

No. You were creating a narrative that Mario's classes all needed to be "top 5" or bust. That way you could drag even a top 7 class as "below expectations". If it's water under the bridge, don't bring it up. But, if you must bring it up, then get the facts right.

It's an oblong-shaped ball. Bounces in all sorts of weird directions. So, yes, chance plays a role. 100%. But, where consequences are completely avoidable and decisions are made that actually take winning from being certain to being uncertain, that is not chance. That is incompetence.

Not for being a mope. For being a troll.

You realize that Mario has been "unlucky" in this scenario twice in his HC career? When you make bad "low probability" events happen with such frequency, you aren't unlucky. You're utilizing poor decision-making to make those bad things happen with more frequency. Luck is a loser's word.

No. It's the result of either someone calculating the probabilities incorrectly, or someone choosing unwisely (because these are not random events).

The fact that a low probability event occurs is not good or bad luck. Especially when low probability events occur at higher than expected rates to the same program/individuals. Over and over again. When that happens, you're not "unlucky." You just ******* suck.