Search results

  1. SFbayCane

    Canes v Bethune-Cookman

    Last year they gave TVD two drives in the 3rd quarter. I wanna see Emory Williams starting the second half.
  2. SFbayCane

    Canes v Bethune-Cookman

    Lol - It was overturned. Its not targeting. The pic you posted showed two guys leading with their helmets. Not a defenseless player. Incidental helmet to helmet contact given that his helmet caused the fumble.
  3. SFbayCane

    Canes v Bethune-Cookman

    So their criminal, thieving-*** administration can cash a $450K check for taking this beating. Of course its the players and not the administrators who have to get treated like 9 year old boys in a cobalt mine for three hours.
  4. SFbayCane

    Canes v Bethune-Cookman

    Nope. One of the better things that's changing this season is that its not automatically Targeting if there is any helmet to helmet contact. Too many times we have to listen to announcers going on and on about "force-able" contact to the head or neck when in reality what we're seeing is...
  5. SFbayCane

    Canes v Bethune-Cookman

    Fair catch at the 30. Live catch at the 3. We have that backwards.
  6. SFbayCane

    Canes v Bethune-Cookman

    should be no penalty, Bethune Cookman ball. Young is not defenseless there.
  7. SFbayCane

    Canes v Bethune-Cookman

    I like them using TVD on the keepers tonight against the smaller opponent. Keep TVD healthy while also getting that on film so the ACC teams will have to at least think about it.
  8. SFbayCane

    Canes v Bethune-Cookman

    My hope is that Bethune Cookman can put up a little bit of a fight.
Back
Top