Search results

He had some pretty impressive plays though. His last drive of the game, he got lit up. And threw the WR open while about to take the hit, and put it in a spot only the WR could catch it. That was big time. Now he didn’t make a ton of those type of plays, because like you said, he didn’t need to.

because, unless you just reset the chalk board, what you saw from the unit last year, has to be the carry over to this year, until they show something else. Last year the problem was they couldn’t make explosive plays. So that should be the default perception of the unit until they show...

Yes we will. It’s very difficult to bully ball your way down field consistently in a game. You almost have to be perfect, both in turnovers and offensive penalties, for that to have any chance of success. Points come from explosive plays.

That’s the concern. The biggest unit v unit advantage in the game is going to be their WR core vs our DBs. You don’t need to go to 247 to see that Stewart was a 5* recruit. It just jumps off the screen. We don’t have anything close to that at corner. So he’s probably going to make plays...

20 to 24. Miami of Oh consistently has one of the worst offenses in college football under Martin. Last year they were 128th. They don’t score on *anybody*. Their defense is pretty good for a G5 school. So I could see their defense setting their offense up a ton and the offense scoring from...

Eh. That’s largely driven by starting field position limiting how many yards they can even get. But they didn’t need it to score. In the rare cases they had bad field position, they still scored.

Yeah. Usually I’m not a fan of a slow pace. But with enough plays run in the game, they would win. Because their WRs are just going to be able to create more explosive plays against us than we can against them. So this might actually be a situation where it makes more sense to slow it down...

Looks like it impacted their ability to score for sure.