Search results

The fix may be simple but I’m not convinced it will directly translate into recruiting victories. Recruiting is rarely a simple fix

Get ready for the “we should have hired lane” crew

Pick is in

Auburn is the team here.

The difference with Samson is that we/the staff felt good about him the whole time.

Sure but aren’t we making a final push for Franklin and stone (and maybe even breland)? So if we’re pushing for 2 big DL prospects with NIL and these other teams (auburn OU, etc) are making a final push for one elite DL, it stands to reason that they will have more to offer than we will.

I need to step away from the keyboard and not take this stuff seriously lol

Cmon mane you know it ain’t all about the HC.

Honestly, I'm not entirely sure when the contracts are executed. It could be when they actually sign, when they commit, I don't know. As for the bags, yeah, people are forgetting about this. Let's say NIL package is worth up to $400k over 4 years. Then, under the table, they are providing...

NILs may be equal but you're ignoring bags.

If it's a bidding war?

And or "or"?

Which ones are you referring to?

we don't want to "overpay".

Well, we're at 15 now, aren't we? We're in line to get a couple more top 150 players before getting a chance at the real big boys, provided we have a good season. Not a stretch to say we'd be in the 8-13 range, which has been the consensus for a while now.

What makes you say he should have been in the bag already? Did he want to commit and we told him to hold off until he was sure or something like that?

The most sought after croot with the big boys, I would argue. All the big boys are looking for monster DTs.