Search results

  1. A

    LIFW

    I think everyone can agree to the bolded portion. But, for example, the school already had to evaluate and approve the reasonableness of the compensation of the NIL deals (pursuant to NCAA regulations and Florida law). Also, even Pack’s deal is small compared to the big NIL players… and we...
  2. A

    LIFW

    You sound like you have a better vantage point than me… but I have to respectfully disagree with the likelihood of players ultimately having financial exposure based upon the available information. All of Ruiz’s public statements support the NIL deals as being arms length business marketing...
  3. A

    LIFW

    This is some super extreme chicken little ****. The law generally has very strong (sometimes unfair to the victim from whom the gains were obtained) protections for innocent parties in arms length business transactions.
  4. A

    LIFW

    Washington politics have nothing to do with generating 24mm in revenue when 900+ million in revenue was predicted. The business ain’t making money - and it’s not demonstrating a conversation of recovery claims owned to actual revenue generation. Unfortunately. Because we all wanted Ruiz to...
  5. A

    LIFW

    I think the school would figure out how to cover any unpaid commitments to current players… but you’re right that clawbacks would be a problem. With that said I highly doubt any NIL payments would be subject to clawbacks because I’m sure they were arms length business transactions (approved by...
  6. A

    LIFW

    Have we still not realized that loudmouths who “tell it like it is” are often actually not telling it like it is? And calling the school Soviets because all business is not done on social media?? Rudy Fernandez and the school have been outspoken and transparent about improving athletics and...
Back
Top