Search results

That's why I'm saying it'll be dependent on our on field performance. If we look really good on the field this year, I don't think we're losing guys.

No I was referring to 24 too. The difference between being ranked in the high teens (like 19) and low double digit or even high single digits (7-12) can be just getting 2-3 highly rated guys that will only come here if we are successful on the field this season. That's why I'm saying maybe our...

Depends how you're framing it. If you're one of the vaginas here worrying about us only bringing in like a 20th ranked class vs a 12th ranked class, the on field results certainly can be the determining factor.

Can we just pin a message to the top of the recruiting page saying the 24 and 25 class is going to entirely be dependent on our performance on the field this year, so everyone should keep their tampons in till we see the on field results and people start act like the sky is falling.