Search results

Let's hope so.

How do you determine that? Because he's not on a fast track? Outside of So Fla there's a taint associated with coaching at UM given our results over the past 20 years. It takes time to rehabilitate your reputation. He should be assessed based on how he coached based on circumstances that he...

You're probably right. In any job search (not just coaching), how broad your network is, increases your visibility and enhances your chances. While most seem disappointed he's not a "splash" hire, the question now is how good is he, does he fit our needs? Just curious, has @Memnon weighed...

Best way to sign stud at WR is to do a 180.

We've had that with Lashlee and Nix being OC/QB to save one the coach count. But a dedicated special team's coach would count as 1 of the 10 which is a luxury that most can't afford. Most would rather have an additional position coach.

Not exactly. The NCAA only restricts the number of coaches that can be on field coaches and recruit off campus. They're not limited to position coaches. Given the restrictions none that I know of dedicate a coach to just special team duties. It's also why most coordinators have position...

Yep, it's not a hard sell.

Not the point. I was primarily commenting on Hartline being silver tongued and developer/teacher is overblown statement. Some disagree that he's silver tongued and, in a room filled with 5*'s, just don't fvck up. Cristobal is non sequitur.

You state yourself he has a bunch of .94+ rating guys. If you have a WR of all 5* guys development is not much of a factor. It's mostly "Don't ***** up". But I can count on one finger the number of teams with that kind of depth. We're certainly not. The next level "developer and teacher"...

I'm not an X and O's person but it's been frequently said our route patterns are FUBAR and our receivers are raw regarding any route concepts (among other things). That being the case, the next WR coach has to have knowledge of the patterns needed to effectively run Dawson's offense and...