Search results

  1. canesstevealum08

    SIAP: College Football Playoff's board discusses possibility, potential of restructuring how college football is governed

    Interesting solution. I would say one other perk to bringing more teams to the party is less guys skipping games that matter.
  2. canesstevealum08

    SIAP: College Football Playoff's board discusses possibility, potential of restructuring how college football is governed

    I hear you, I just think the other benefit to expanding is giving recruits more options instead of just the preseason top 5.
  3. canesstevealum08

    SIAP: College Football Playoff's board discusses possibility, potential of restructuring how college football is governed

    I don’t understand how the goal is not to have every power conference involved in possibly winning a national championship and expanding who gets big-time recruits
  4. canesstevealum08

    SIAP: College Football Playoff's board discusses possibility, potential of restructuring how college football is governed

    Why? I’ll never understand this argument. March madness is great cause in theory anybody can build a dynasty with enough tourney appearances. In 98, Gonzaga was only known for John Stockton. In football we basically hate the idea that an underdog can win a natty. That’s why we don’t expand.
  5. canesstevealum08

    SIAP: College Football Playoff's board discusses possibility, potential of restructuring how college football is governed

    Ok I’ll play if you do 8, at least one loser of a conf title game will be in the at large pool. Prob from big 10 or sec and you prob won’t have 5 power conf anyway
  6. canesstevealum08

    SIAP: College Football Playoff's board discusses possibility, potential of restructuring how college football is governed

    They should still expand the playoff and shrink division 1. Making the playoff has to match the scope of who’s in the fight
Back
Top