Search results

I know I said I was done with this but I have to comment. It wasn’t about “schooling” you it was about stating there was a basis about my opinion, it wasn’t just off the wall. PS, a discussion doesn’t have to be a fight. Peace

I hope this isn’t indicative of your courtroom demeanor. Sometimes I agree with you and sometimes I have a different opinion. This is a message board for Christ sakes. You don’t have to be so combative all the time. I’m done with this. Have a nice day. :)

A comment, suggestion, or observation made by a judge in an opinion that is not necessary to resolve the case. In other words, it means diddly squat.

The District Court said educational related benefits were in violation of antitrust. In the Supreme Court case, the NCAA asked the court to rule that all existing compensation restrains be immune to antitrust scrutiny. The plaintiffs chose not to did not renew their across-the-board challenge...

You're right about one thing. The opinion doesn't specifically address NIL, but it most definitely found the NCAA in violation of federal anti-trust statutes. Their decision had a narrow focus on related to compensation for "educational related benefits". This was because NCAA challenged the...

I am on a first name basis with an IRS auditor, a supervisor no less. The IRS is concerned that taxes are paid on all income whether legally or illegally obtained. (If illegal they'll refer it to the Treasury department, FBI, DEA, or relevant agency for prosecution). Tax evasion crimes are...