Search results

Maybe, but giving it to players would require changes to the ncaa rules that most schools (even the leading ones) likely don't want. Right now the schools can not give any money to Playes/recruits and most actually like that as it means they can keep any revenue they get for coaches, facilities...

Part of the reason they moved to allowing transfers was b/c any other student or coach can do it, so while I agree it would help insulate some of this, I don't think that genie is going back in the bottle.

Even if they truly believed that the old system was legitimate and fair, they should have been prepared if the courts disagreed. I don't think they should have fought it like they did, but it was idiotic not to have a backup plan that they were working on while fighting it.

That's basically what Jack Swarbrick says in this interview. I know... two hated source, but what he is saying makes sense: "Notre Dame athletic director Jack Swarbrick told Sports Illustrated that he believes the breakup of college sports at the NCAA Division I level is “inevitable,” and puts...

Maybe not the masses, but it doesnt take the masses to donate... it only takes a relatively small portion of wealthy people to do that (as we are seeing with Miami, Texas A&M, Oregon, Tenn, etc). I am happy that we happened to luck into a very wealthy and eager booster at the same time that NIL...

Agreed - but as it stands right now, outside of Congress passing laws (seems very unlikely), no one has a solution that is legal/feasible.

The reason the NFL and other sports are able to have salary cap is that they have a collective bargaining agreement with the players. If they did not have this it would be collusion. The NFL players have realized that it is in their collective best interested to have a cap so that a handful of...