“In terms of finality, true.
In terms of receipts, false:”
^What does that even mean?
BTW, the only guy more popular than the backup QB is the mysterious “unnamed witness” in a case like this.
Seems to me that Flores’ accusations about being paid to tank have NOT been proven to be true.
Ridley’s gambling, in the other hand, HAS been proven to be true.
When I first glanced at the quote I thought he was saying, “I would bet $1500 that I don’t have a gambling problem.”
That would have been even more horrible.