Search results

No I get it - I think he has a legit chance to win and because he has some proof - he has the BB text messages. I am 100% for him on this. I don't think they followed their own rules. I don't know about any of the rest of the stuff a lot of people are throwing out there but it doesn't appear...

I think he will have a shot at proving the Giants did not interview him with good faith because of the Billicheck text messages.

It would be Raciest if he didn't get the job or interview because he IS A MINORITY. If that is the case then heads should role - I am just saying we don't have those facts at all - so why do we go straight to that??? It is a pretty serious accusation - better have some facts behind it or it...

I think we cheapen it when we automatically go to the raciest claim - I think when we have some facts and if we find it we kill it! But Holly **** we throw that word around so much anymore that half the world has become numb to it - which I would argue is the total opposite effect we are trying...

Break a company rule you can be fired - break a law you should go to jail. I feel it is apples and oranges. Now if you want to argue the Giants should have repercussions because they did not follow company policies then I am with you. I guess I just think your analogy is too severe. Not...

Oh because YOU HAVE SAID IT you must be right. You line of thinking is just ridicule's. I guy didnt get a job so everyone must be a raciest - brilliant.

How is it racism because they hired the guy they wanted? Just because he wasn't black they are automatically racist? We use that word way to liberally. And this is from a guy who wanted them to hire Flo!!! But I also understand people like the hot new thing not the guy who just got let go.

This is a league rule not a law - I feel like it is apples to oranges.