Search results

I thought you were done here?

teams don't run the ball to get into FG range. They run the ball after they get into fg range. If LV was going for the GW FG, they would never had run the ball on 2nd and 14 from the 47. That's a 64 yard FG from there. That loss of four on 1st and 10 from LAC 43 changed their plan. They had...

That 3 yard loss on 1st and 10 that moved LV back to the LAC 47, LV was packing it in. They had nothing to lose.

They were not going to attempt a FG prior to the TO. They were running out the clock. Each snap was under five seconds, run plays, no urgency whatsoever. Raiders had NOTHING to lose in that scenario.

When the Raiders lost 3 yards on the 1st and 10 run play at LAC 44 yard line, they were content in letting the clock run out until LAC called the TO.

There's NO defense for LAC calling the timeout. They should have never called the TO. Raiders were running out the clock. I listed their play selection leading up to the TO in a post above. Raiders showed ZERO urgency to score prior to the TO and then the first down run by Jacobs.

Chargers called TO right before :04 on the play clock, :38 on the game clock.

LV play calls 2:00 on clock, 1st 10 at LAC 44. Run up the middle, loss of three. 1:20 on clock :04 on play clock, run to LAC 39 (3rd & 4) :38 on the clock, Raiders walking to the LOS, Chargers take TO with .05 on play clock. BEFORE THE TO RAIDERS WERE RUNNING OUT THE CLOCK. two straight run...

Correct, Carr said the TO changed the plan.

Carr did admit it in his postgame interview. He said Charger’s TO changed the plan at the end.

Stop it.

Owner of the LAC should fire Staley tonight. Right now. In other news, Staley DC for Canes

Nope, Staley is a freaking CORCH

Not after that hip injury

I want to fight everyone in that Dolphins WAR room

If the clock hits 0:00

LV going for the win.