Search results

Exactly, if you can’t seed teams before the championship games, that’s neither fair or a true playoff because the two best teams are playing each other in the first round, that’s not a fair shot. You’re beyond help if you are honestly arguing that this wouldn’t adversely effect the best...

Logic is so far gone for you. You said the championship games would be the opening round of the playoff, now you’re taking about seeding teams after that, just like they do now. Bottom line is conference championships from crap conferences don’t qualify you for the playoff more than actually...

Ummm, this isn’t a playoff because True playoffs are seeded. In no sport do the two best teams play in the opening round. You’re trying to fix something you think is unfair by making more things unfair to more teams, it makes no sense. plus, who plays who after these games and which...

Except half those Teams are completely undeserving of being in a bonafide playoff. Iowa, Utah, Oregon are top 15 ish. And you forgot to mention Pitt supposedly being more deserving than uga with your rationale, which is asinine. Almost as dumb as thinking 3 loss utah, who lost to byu, sdsu...

ESPN is also in bed with the acc, we are just a bad conference

Except then you have an even more diluted actual playoff. So uga is out and ND is in? That’s new. nd is out because they’re not in a conference? Ok, then Baylor is in with two losses And plays bama? Yeah, That would be fun to watch…

People thought the same about Lawrence and Clemson when they thrashed bama, **** happens though. And if that Auburn rb had not run out of bounds, they’d be a two loss team right Now

Todays semifinals were just like 90% of all cfp semifinal games…they are almost all blowouts, which is why expanding the playoffs seems pointless to me when the top 2 teams beat the crap out of the other top 4 teams

Winning a conference doesn’t mean you’re a top 4 team…it just doesn't. I believe uga is proving that now. They belong, stop complaining