Search results

I understand that you really like to lecture, cannot actually respond when challenged, and just want someone to tell you that you are right. I hate to think what you are like to work with professionally. The fact that you keep trying to proclaim some sort of victory or dominance demonstrates...

I did not claim that. I said that was the simplified version of the deal when Nebraska was in the admission procedure as the Big 10 knew it was going to lose accreditation. I knew it from inside knowledge at the time and it has become relatively common knowledge since. Please share your...

I don't do passive-aggressive. You are on quite the lecture role today. You did not correct anything, you just mis-interpreted. It would have been mis-information if I stated Nebraska had regained accreditation; I did not. I very simply stated that the agreement was their share was reduced...

Yes, I know what I wrote. That was the deal for admission. I did not say they became re-accredited, but maybe your post helps you feel important. If so, congratulations.

Didn't say it was.

What does that mean?

Nebraska was and lost it during realignment. Big 10 still took them, relying on their ability to regain accreditation, but reduced their media rights revenues until that happened.

They were, then they lost it during the realignment process. The Big 10 knew it was coming and reduced their otherwise equal medal rights share until they got re-accredited.

The Big 10 will not take a school not accredited by the AAU. Miami is not so accredited. Also the Big 10 has never taken school that did not have a wrestling program. The Big 10 wants what it considers complimentary institutions. The rules are changing, but I doubt they change that much.