Search results

Ha. I think you've officially taken this too seriously. And, I'll drop your "irrational" accusation since you want to cling to it despite the evidence I showed you from my responses to other posters. Gameday threads operate a lot like sitting around a bar making comments while watching a game...

Well, that was at least an interesting game to watch and discuss.

I see. Except I've explained in other posts I got a single view of the play. My reasoning was it looked like a momentum throw. If it was a grab and pull, I missed it, as I've noted a couple times (albeit to another poster). Above the fray? Ha. This is a message board, bud. I'm here as a poster...

For the **** I sometimes give announcers, I give Tessitore credit here for keeping an even tone. His kid is on BC. It'd be halfway understandable if he went off on Clemson the way Lamar Thomas went off on FIU.

Yo. Nice hands by that TE. Tip of the cap.

That dude's getting to the edge on the Clemson defense with the same likelihood of our WRs winning jump balls.

They'll review that and call it. Although it's a pretty tough call in the sense the dude was moving to his right. Tough as **** for a defender. The "launch" is probably what does it there.

I don't know what that means. You understand why my ex-gf asked as many repeated questions as you did in that post? Maybe you, too, are a latin woman. If so, please shoot me a DM with instructions on how to deal with ya'll on a consistent basis. Would greatly help.

If it was grab and pull, I missed it. Ref called it before he saw the result, but timing is important when Clemson needed better field position. If I were biased toward a team, I wouldn't wait till the obvious moments to "help." I'd pull a Tim Donaghy and weave that **** in throughout the game...

Where's my emotion? Ha. That's a weird accusation. Those "throws" happen all the time. Maybe I should get a second look at the play, but the one on the replay from the 50 yard line looked like a Clemson player running forward and a dude "throwing" him - not the the usual grab and pull. Like I...

I could argue the guy was going forward on the "throw." Watch the lines and see **** like that on nearly every play. I appreciate a good contrarian (especially one who clicks on the site's Ads), but it's tough to ignore the ACC when you apply the "who benefits" question.

You understand that "hold" call on the 2nd punt was questionable? Ignoring the history of well-timed calls in favor of whatever the ACC needs? Mirroring my ex-gf with all those repeated questions?

"Yo, fool, can't call too many of them in a row against them. Throw something inconsequential at Clemson."

LMAO @ the flags.

That Clemson QB sometimes throws from an extremely wide base. Hope he air mails one to a Safety at some point later.

And, now we'll get a closer look at Venables. Interested to see his adjust inside. I expect initial run blitzes, and expect BC to adjust. Let's see if BC can run some crossers or isolate that TE.

So yeah. Going to be an interesting 2nd half.

Can we recruit anyone BC is looking at along the interior OL?