Search results

Of course UM is 10 short because we've mismanaged the roster. That's why we're never a good model to use. Bumping up the ICs by 3 is not a bad idea either. That's basically what I proposed, only I tied into transfers lost. If the problem is too many transfers, then I think tying the solution...

Some responses in bold within the quote.

I am trying my best not to be disrespectful, but the highlighted section is about the most absurd (football-related) thing I have heard on CIS. We have a new offense being installed by our new offensive coordinator, new OL coach, and new WR coach, to be run by our new GT QB, and you are glad we...

This would bring utter chaos to recruiting. Incentivizing transfers by essentially making them unlimited (because coaches at top ranked schools will just push more under-performing kids out) and not counting any transfers as ICs is not a wise solution. The Bagas, Clem$ons, UGA($)s, Texa$es...