Search results

Why should you fire a guy who shouldn’t be the guy to begin with?

True but... Richt’s gave us the biggest gift in the world (resigning) and then we went and spent $4MM for the rights to promote a DC from a failed regime. We saved money and then lit some of it on fire.

That is the first step. Then we need to make sure we don't bring in another potato and bring in an actual AD with passion, competence and autonomy.

UM loves to spend and waste money. They specifically like to make sure they pay after the coach failed miserably. They love to buyout coaches. Nothing makes our BOTs and admin happier than wasting money and giving a nice parting gift. What better way to waste money than pay $4MM for the...

They’re elite when it comes to handing out unnecessary extensions.

And you’re a potato and consistent porster. You were provided with examples and clarification of said examples. You also disregarded a lot of the post. I like how your original googling, when I first posted the names, got you incorrect info.

I’m aware.

It isn't the amount of time of the contract (3 year v. 4 year v. 5 year), it is the buyout that matters. The buyout ends the contract TODAY, should you choose to exercise it.

You're not intelligent. But we knew that. Haywood at Pitt. Price at Bama. O'Leary at ND. Petrino and Cameron also were fired after 1 year. Yes, it was the NFL. Those are examples. By the way, you disregarded the rest of the post. Even if it was NEVER done before, that doesn't mean it...

Even if Rhule was a failure (at his current job), the comparison makes no sense.

Not sure where to begin: 1. How many HCs were coaching the D for the 3 years prior to taking their gig? Didn't Manny know, at least, half the players on the team? Didn't he recruit those players? 2. Why does it matter that no HC was fired after year 1? Does that mean it shouldn't be done...

Matt Rhule, hahahahahahahaha. Hahahahahahahaah.