Search results

So in this case, the only thing that changes is that the player is no longer penalized. That's exactly what the law is designed for. All these payments from boosters happen anyway, and the only one who gets in trouble is the player. No booster has ever been punished for their actions, and now...

It's the American way

That's just your opinion. Only time will tell whether they were wrong or right.

He's talking about the local markets. Miami vs Tuscaloosa, there's no comparison. Under the California law, I dont think the schools will being paying for play. It just opens up avenues for the athletes to make money away from the school using their position as a football player for X University.

4 stars from South Florida maybe.

Yeah that probably will happen for the 5 stars and top recruits. But that's not happening for 4 stars and 3 stars. They would benefit from performing well on the field and earning endorsements in a large market. Or earning money from club appearances and things of that nature.

I love this and totally agree with the California law. The good old boy colleges will fight this tooth and nail because it negates their biggest advantage, alumni money. This law will mostly benefit the schools located in metropolitan cities, like USC, UCLA, Miami, etc. With this law in affect...