Search results

In Dabo’s first full season, he went 9-5. This was in 2009. He took over on an interim basis in 2008 (he went 4-3). Bowden went 9-4 in 2007. He was fired (mid-season) in 2008 after going 3-3.

So both are random and irrelevant.

And Manny was here for the last ______ years before he was appointed. Kirby was thrown into it. So does this mean it is irrelevant? Because I am fairly certain there is no correlation and if Kirby performed chitty, nobody would bring it up (like DJ Durkin).

I’m aware. It is irrelevant. Why not use DJ Durkin or the tons of other dudes who never accomplished anything?

Cool beans, would you agree that Smart’s tenure at UGA has nothing to do with Manny at Miami?

So because Kirby Smart started 8-5 and then had his “success”, Manny will have the same success here? Why not use DJ Durkin as an example?