Search results

You know the numbers, you're just being obtuse. Let me guess, you believe in the racist "blacks are only 13% of population, but they commit more than half of all homicides" narrative, don't you? That racist narrative would be the same thing as saying every black person killed 0.0001 black...

Yup...I interpret “when necessarily committed" to mean "no other choice" depending on the circumstances.

Yup, and this is why I don't trust any of em', broad generalizations for the actions of a few is apt in this scenario.

With video/or audio evidence they do...with no video/or audio evidence the cops that killed Walter Scott & Corey Jones would've still been cops. Now of course you have crooked departments that collude with State Attorneys offices to sweep $h!t under the rug, but the statutes still apply. That...

I meant exactly what I said, what you wrote is bologna, the Florida statutes that you posted support my point. A cop can't shoot a fleeing suspect just because, shooting Walton would've been unjustified, the cop(s) that tried to apprehend Walton showed good judgement.

Bolagna...if any of what's written above were true, then why is Michael Slager, the cop that shot & killed Walter Scott through the back, in prison for 20 years? No, the real problem is when it's unjustified, with no video evidence, and it's a lyin' *** cop's word vs a dead man's. My point...

Again, anybody that afraid to do their job should find another line of work.

No, it doesn't, shooting a suspect in the back is unjustifiable. Not even soldiers are given that much leeway and I'm sure they're in constant fear for their lives. Anybody that afraid to do their job should find another line of work as they clearly lack the temperament for the job.

No you weren't, Adolf, you were summoning your KKK contingent. Did you not learn anything after @Tee3000 mopped the floor with your racist ***???