Search results

Literally, the only argument made in the article was about the 2019 class. He did not make any arguments on trends either. You are using a straw man fallacy to claim that Brad is making an argument that is not making. Brad did not make any NFL projections in the article and national...

My post linked the article, it seems like a good article for a recruiting board. The only analysis I have provided is that he should have ranked Georgia 4th based off of his own criteria. He claims to be looking at the 2019 class, so you can't claim he really is making a point that he doesn't...

Yeah, I called that out. Why would you rank the 2019 class off of the NFL? That literally makes no sense, you are trying to fight an argument that he isn't making. All he is doing is ranking the 2019 recruiting class by state.

Can you quote where I "shill"'ed for anyone? Really just linking an article. I also noted how ranked Georgia ahead of three states that he admittedly didn't use his data for. If anything Georiga should have been fourth.

His population was only one cycle (2019) and he called that out. If you want to judge high school talent as a whole you would need to use more than 1 class and weight the classes with newer classes holding more weight. If you want to use NFL talent then you will literally do the exact same thing...

He ranked Georiga ahead of California, Texas, and Florida despite all three states having more composite 4-star players. He mentioned this was subjective on his part and he did it due to the similar amount of top 150 prospects (Florida and Georgia both have 19). As far as I know, Brad doesn't...

Brad wrote an article about the 2019 recruiting cycle, not NFL production. You are going to have to wait 4 years to judge this class by NFL talent.

Places Georgia, Texas and California ahead of Florida for the 2019 cycle. https://247sports.com/LongFormArticle/Recruiting-national-signing-day-2019-Florida-Texas-Georgia-talent-128622751/#128622751_10