Search results

Yeah, don't know what to tell you. OL is the position that relies on coaching the most out of any other unit. Stop trying to detract away from the initial argument that Searels is not a good coach. Period.

You act like we run a complex scheme; we don't. And again, Searels has never had a good OL wherever he's been. A lot of people questioned this hire and a majority turned out to be right. If your unit looks the way it does in year 3, it's the coach, not the players. Also, when your OL has 4-5...

Again, UF's OL was garbage, in year 1 they look like a competent group. In year 3, our OL still looks like a train wreck. Donaldson was one of the highest recruited linemen in the country, and after 2 years, people are already calling him a bust. St. Louis was a 4 star, he's not that good...

So, you think it's been a talent issue the whole time and that Searles just needs another year (his 4th)? You do realize that this guy has had mediocre O-lines everywhere he's coached at.

Not unless we get a new OL coach. It doesn't take 3+ plus years for OL to develop in a consistent unit. UF had a dumpster fire OL during the McElwain era. In Mullen's first year, his OL coach has his unit playing at a consistent level. And mind you, Miami and UF have about the same talent level...

What's your thought process on year 3 then? Have you seen what our class looks like right now?

You could say that recruiting ties in overall as well as with gameday approach, roster management and every other aspect of coaching. This fanbase has been up in arms about everything the staff does wrong. The issues I have with them on the trail is how they leave themselves little wiggle room...