Search results

I'm not going to battle X's and O's with a coach, but I will point out a few things. 1. "Not having a FB or TE shouldn't limit anything. The best offenses in college football barely utilize a FB/TE." All of you guys thinking we're about to switch over from a Pro-Style to a Spread Read Option...

Honestly about a 4. Which is plenty good enough to hand the ball off and complete enough passes to win games. It is not, however, good enough to consistently win games by throwing it 45 times behind an offensive line that can only generate 20 yards In the run game. Put it this way. I’d rather...

You’re getting pretty personal. You got a problem with my social media? You getting itchy? You think this argument you can’t win online is gonna work out differently for you in person? Pm me. I’ll send you an address.

Hey ****head, why don’t you put on your glasses and reread what I wrote, since you’re quoting me, and highlight where I said something positive about Rosier? The reason you keep looking like a moron here is because you’re arguing against something that nobody is arguing for. I don’t recall me or...

Bull****. A few of you have been on just about every QB board running Rosier into the ground with made up nonsense and ain’t had the balls to back up a word of it. As if it weren’t bad enough that Rosier’s inaccuracy cost us a lot of plays in the passing game, you’re trying to pin our problems...

Not having a true fullback and proven depth at TE really limited what we were able to do last season more than people are willing to admit. Herndon was really good, but after him the depth was MI2 and a converted DE. We didn't even have a FB on scholly. We had a wildly inaccurate QB attempt 45...