Search results

Still trying, I see. You sound like a little kid. Is it your night night time? Maybe you should try again tomorrow after you finish your homework.

First of all, I'm not your bruh. Secondly, what's fact and not an opinion, is Langham HASN'T been moved to tight end by the very staff that speak of. Please keep that in mind.

Dude you are trying way to hard to defend an idea that is not going to happen, nor should it. Some position changes make sense: Finley to Striker....love it. Choc to FB.....I can dig it. Deejay to RB.....brilliant. Langham to TE....

Dugans: Langham is not making that jump to the next level at WR. We should move him to your room. Hartley:

There lies the problem. A lot of teams, like us, are now starting to use a safety or even a thicker/taller corner to cover the TE's, instead of slow LB's. ****, even some LB's are now as fast as DB's. He would essentially face the same problems that he was facing as a WR.

Being big and playing big are two separate things. The knock on Langham, including this spring, is he plays like he is 5'10". This is not me saying this, it's Richt, Dugans, and Brown. But yet you want to move him to TE? He made a great play against FSU and I will forever be grateful. That's...

Nothing about this make sense to me. Due to the fact that he's a senior who's had an underwhelming career at WR, we should try him out at TE? Really? And the only justification is, "he's tall". LMFAO. Mallory and Jordan obviously didn't arrive in the spring. Meaning, they are going to need as...