Search results

I think Rosier has to do a little better 54-56%, but you're right that an improved run game is the biggest thing we need right now. Our inability to convert 3rd and short or punch the ball in from inside the 10 really held us back.

Also you should take into account his running. His completion percentage is garbage and that's not nothing, but he did a lot with his legs to help even that out. He put up an amount of offense (roughly) equal to Kaaya's passing, and he's got a better defense and that led to 10 wins. If he had...

Agree with all that, especially about going with the guy who gives you the best shot right now. I've got no problem playing a RF/F, but only if they look better than Rosier at this point. I'm not in the mood for a throw away year so the new guy can get experience. But if it looks like we're...

That's real hard to look at for a number of reasons.

I wasn't arguing that you were wrong about it being a good idea, I just wanted to see if it's something we did or not. Other than starting in the backfield, is there a difference between the two? Isn't it the same basic concept, or no? I assume the intent of both is to run a guy across the...

I'm not trying to be a dck, but I easily found 2 in one game, and as I said those are just the ones that made the highlights. I would expect there to be more.

Walton at 00:10, Richards at 1:30...that's 2 in one game, and those are just the ones that went for big gains. I'm bored, but not bored enough to watch the whole game and get you a full count, but it looks like we do run them.

But we NEED an OC...I'm sure the NCAA wouldn't mind if we hired just one more guy. They're reasonable folks.

Nothing at all, I'm just not sure he'd make a difference. Me being unconvinced is obviously not a reason not to hire him, and presumably he wouldn't be any worse. The easy solution, is that our guys start playing to their potential and we win on talent and a doged refusal to lose. Once I see...

Are you sure? I thought the team couldn't have on-field contact with coaches over the summer. My understanding was that the coaches could talk to them off-field and tell them what they should be doing, but it was up to the players to go do it on their own.

Nothing against Dorsey, but I'm not sure why you are so sure he's a great hire. What has he done that has you so convinced hiring him would be a "big boy" move? I'd be happy to take the chance as I'm starting to think Richt might lack the ability to change what he does based on what his team...