Search results

Our current designs are great. You're trippin.

This will surely affect me and how I respond going forward.

Bruh smh how did you read what I wrote and come to the conclusion I said people shouldn't be allowed to talk about the potential future Nike deal? What I actually said was, since the Deal isn't imminent; as in there is no actual news that it's happening soon. Maybe it'll be this month maybe...

Right this thread is about a non existent deal and your angry people enter a thread you didn’t start and say things about our current actual deal lol. Highsmith saying that 2 years ago is a good reason why people can still talk about our current deal. This conversation will shift to exclusively...

Been a fun day in this thread guys @Rellyrell @TheOriginalCane Hopefully we switch to JB sooner than later so we don't gotta keep running this back.

Multiple times huh. Doubt it. I mean if you're misinterpreting peoples meaning because you are apparently not reading full sentences cause you're "cutting you off early", that's a pretty normal thing to correct in a conversation. Hey who would have thought I'd have to explain the importance of...

Wait I'm the one arguing over semantics after this dudes brain broke at the fact I said 15% <100M, 75% 100M, 10% >100M.... lol the absolute hilarity when someone deigns disagree with some of yalls arguments and your utter seriousness in a thread about apparel on here always makes me laugh...

Lets play a game called spot the difference: "Nike didn't value us nearly as much as yall want to make it out to be" vs "Nike didn't value us" Hmm I wonder if one quote is trying to intentionally be misleading or not... hmmm.

"Historically, you haven't seen a lot of that in Nike deals," Kish said. "Adidas, from reading a lot of these contracts, pioneered those sorts of 'sweeteners.' T-shirts for the student sections, student events, for example. But I think there's more demand for that because universities see the...

So $16M guaranteed up front wouldn't have been good now? Meanwhile yall have been barely willing to say Nikes deal for us to renew at that time would have paid us more than Adidas which is only like $8M/yr, and almost entirely dependent on the fact that Adidas deal was just too long. Ight how...

I didn't say "there is a 75% chance that you hit that number right on the head" lol. Again it really is funny that when I just said 15%, 75% 10% you took that to mean EXACT numbers, and not a range like any reasonable person would assume. Bro how you can't comprehend that saying $100M was an...

So if we had better contract lawyers that made it impossible to not get what we were promised, we'd end up getting matched to Louisvilles $16M/yr... Sounds like a good deal to me as far as the money is concerned. Just too long, and not properly vetted. Of course that means the actual issue...

Guaranteed $100M is better than a 15% chance at <$100M, 75% chance at $100M, and a 10% chance at >$100M. Royalties are only better if they result in more money - which they are absolutely NOT guaranteed to do lol. Obvious, but somehow you don't like that fact. I've never said Royalties CAN'T be...

Man your God complex is really taking over right now huh. You really don't know why I post anything lol. Of course Rather than accepting what other people say, you always try to interpret everything as an attack, I assume probably cause that's your mentality. Anyways...

Yet again you thinking youre more important than you are. You don't control what anyone posts.

Yea Bank runs are truly wild.

“ur logic in attempting to change my POV regarding this specific topic.” Lol not everything is an attack/criticism. I wasn’t trying to change your opinion about anything. I read what you wrote and it made me curious what SVBs stock was before they crashed.

"They have continued to plummet in their valuation at a rate I’ve not seen before." I was giving an example of another significant plummet.

Silicon Valley Bank did a speedrun going from $267.83/share to $0.40/share in 20 days...