Look, anyone who is shocked that
@crossover22[]_[] says bigoted things and then tries to backpedal and turn those comments into peer-evaluated social studies thesis statements supported by vague articles and stats he read online...
Congratulations on joining CanesInsight five minutes ago, I hope you will enjoy posting.
The real hallmark of this kind of
@crossover22[]_[] 's criticism involves the assumptions and the hot-button words. There's always so much concern about "the kids" and "inner-city" individuals, and let's not forget the inevitable invocation of the worst place on the planet, CHICAGO. It's all a part of the same faulty analysis and stereotyping.
Let's just be honest. I don't care how much money you have, as long as you...you know...USE A BANK, you are not out there being robbed every day. There are soooo many people with far more money than a few hundred P5 football/basketball players, and they are not all being robbed. And, sure, some can claim that this is also about age/immaturity, but...
There are plenty of young "influencers" who make money. Young models. Young individual sports stars like tennis players and golfers. Young soccer and basketball players in countries not named "the USA". There are young pop stars and young actors. In short, I am not sure why we are bemoaning some sort of massive nouveau riche problem among a (comparatively) small group of newly-empowered (last 2 years) high-level football/basketball players.
How is it that EVERY OTHER GROUP of "young" people who have started to make money...are not surrounded 247 by stickup artists and killers? Nobody says that "kids" are not envious or any other emotion. But there are SO MANY avenues by which young people can make money...can anyone tell me when some young envious kids robbed BTS because they had money?
This whole expression of "concern for inner-city kids" is so strange. Someone has mentioned the Coogan Law, which could easily be enacted in the 49 states not named California if people really carrrrred so much. Otherwise, it's very condescending and biased to ONLY express concern recently, and only for fooball and basketball players earning NIL (if they come from the inner city), while ignoring all other walks of life that are allowing young people to make large sums of money before they reach the age of adulthood.
I'm sure
@crossover22[]_[] will soon reference yet another study or article that he found online. Good for him. But there was really no reason to bring "inner city youth" or "Chicago" into this conversation. ANYONE who gets a large sum of money at a relatively young age (teen-agers or young adults) without the benefit of financial obligation is subject to any number of risks. That has been happening for quite a long time, and will continue to happen. Two years worth of NIL payments to a few hundred of the better pre-professional football/basketball players is not going to change that equation.