Search results

  1. LuCane

    X's and O's Guidry's Multiple Defense: Marrying Front to Coverage

    Some have talked about him at the 3 (eventually), and I know that's functionally different than the 4i, but you think 280 (possibly more?) may not be big enough for a college TITE front? Genuine question. Venables has previously [successfully] pushed out the TITE front with guys the same size or...
  2. LuCane

    X's and O's Guidry's Multiple Defense: Marrying Front to Coverage

    First of all, I'm biased because this is the part of following football I enjoy most, but I appreciate this. I love the nuance you addressed. It's almost always lost on the boards and through text. So, thank you. This is the biggest question for at least the first 6 games. Is that $ gonna be...
  3. LuCane

    X's and O's Guidry's Multiple Defense: Marrying Front to Coverage

    Hence, the question on TITE fronts. If you want to play both of them and a true DE/OLB, like Alston or maybe Malik Bryant, you likely use Mesidor and Bain as 5techs (or 4i).
  4. LuCane

    X's and O's Guidry's Multiple Defense: Marrying Front to Coverage

    I agree. And, that's better than what we trotted out there last year. Taylor, Deen, and others weren't well-suited for the 0 - even if they tried. Moten didn't make the leap, though he's still young. That Louisville game was a mess, for example. Deen routinely got washed. I'm hoping for exactly...
  5. LuCane

    X's and O's Guidry's Multiple Defense: Marrying Front to Coverage

    Awesome. Few topics: - With the smoke and mirrors needed last year, I think we clearly did our best work when Guidry cooked up a new look, obviously. For example, when we slid into 3-3-5, we performed well/better for a short bit. This, despite a slew of injuries. What do you think is our...
Back
Top