Search results

It's one of those situations where neither side is correct, but the answer is in the middle. It's knowing exactly where that defines a good coach/evaluator.

If we had Arch, we would have seen if he's for real or not in the Clemson and FSU games.

True, but that's a very unique situation. One that I hope will get Billy one more season.

UF didn't give a false picture of Rashada? Also, don't discount the optics of going into a bidding war and losing.

I can see why you think that, but I also think NIL has blurred the picture somewhat. especially with the top rated guys.

The question is whether the gamble is worth it. Dropping big money for a developmental year is a gamble. Now imagine a proven QB becomes available in that QB's second year and he transfers out because he doesn't want to sit another year as backup. You just spent a lot and got nothing.

As a transfer.

And he was in the 2021 class. He was #2 that year. #1 was Quinn Ewers and #3 was Sam Huard. Edit: Top 3 for 2022: 1. Drew Allar 2. Cade Klubnik 3. Conner Weigman Top 3 for 2023: 1. Arch Manning 2. Nico Iamaleava 3. Dante Moore

When was the last time a top 3-5 HS QB came into CFB and was dominant?

Wasn't the concern that he didn't play good competition up in Mass?

Post a link or get a false information warning point.

@JamesQuall

Burroughs for one.

If we get a new stadium, it's 100% because I posted that. And I'll gladly add a purple filter to my avatar and send you a rainbow sherbet scratch and sniff to use whenever you read one of my posts. * Assuming I can find one.

I mean, we also have 423 threads about a new stadium that is as likely as my turning purple and smelling like rainbow sherbet.

People give the best information they have. Sometimes that changes. Trying to hold them accountable for that is where the problem lies. Take it for what it is. If you get a prediction, know that the staff is working on a recruit to get him to commit and leave it at that. Don't go ordering...

That was specifically one tgat was deemed okay and used as an example. It's the fact that people can't resist replying that's the issue.