Search results

My point is that the net impact on the roster must be considered when acquiring talent. If the team or position group is better off with the addition, then full speed ahead. Mario brought in 2 QBs because we are better off with Ward and Poff EVEN if it means Jaccuri and Emory bolt. If the net...

Not really. It just means that those who leave are putting their own interests and goals above the team. You cannot reasonably expect everyone to buy into the culture. There are always those who say one thing, but their actions indicate otherwise.

Spoken like somebody who probably has never managed a team before. Whenever you introduce a new hire to an existing team there is disruption. Nobody sets out with a goal to acquire inferior talent. The goal will always be to acquire talent that makes your existing team better. That’s not in...

What if signing a top ranked DB from the Portal triggers one of your projected DB starters to enter the Portal? What if signing a top outside threat at WR only triggers one of your projected second string WRs to hit the Portal? Does that change your thinking? The calculus isn’t as simple as...