Watching Greenbay's Defense

[The Dude]

This is what we are moving to - no doubt about it. We won't be a dominant D until our DT and DE's get a push while playing their two gaps. Oh yeah, we are also missing a clay Matthews. ****! I just want to be good again.

 

[GhostofVenice01]

GBs DL is taught to get upfield unlike other 3-4 schemes ie Pittsburgh and NE

 

[DeadPoets]

Other than about 5 teams... the rest of the NFL is missing a Clay Matthews too.

 

[TexasCane90]

Other than about 5 teams... the rest of the NFL is missing a Clay Matthews too.

yeah and our clay matthews is currently at BTW...

 

[FlipT]

Jim Grobe scheme is more like NE being that he was under the Parcells coaching tree.

 

[gogeta4]

gb defense sucks ne way...dont want that d.

 

[Canesbball]

That defense requires a beast in the middle (Raji & Worthy) and a solid pass rush (Matthews and Perry) neither of which we have.

 

[Staybon]

GBs DL is taught to get upfield unlike other 3-4 schemes ie Pittsburgh and NE

yep. and can look at GB and Pitt get LBs that on average are a lot smaller than what NE and KC will have. most just see 3-4 instead of how these teams run their 3-4.

 

[MadCane]

So now we're using a performance against the absolute worst offensive line in the NFL as the example of "what we are moving to"?

 

[HTownCane71305]

gb defense sucks ne way...dont want that d.

que?

 

[D7.]

Jim Grobe scheme is more like NE being that he was under the Parcells coaching tree.

Who?

 

[dodaniels]

Other than about 5 teams... the rest of the NFL is missing a Clay Matthews too.

yeah and our clay matthews is currently at BTW...

Nope he is at Kansas St.

 

[MetalCane]

i keep saying for this defense to work. you need two disruptive defensive tackles.

 

[CaneSuger]

i keep saying for this defense to work. you need two disruptive defensive tackles.

Replace "tackles" with "ends" and I totally agree.