It took ten years to get out of the 1929 crash and depression. Very few had jobs a good percentage lost everything. This generation loses their phones and they would jump off of buildings never mind not having enough food. This stimulus is BS don't be fooled. It just puts more pressure on the younger people so we can live above our means. Don't be surprised if you see some inflation here, go back to work or pay the consequences and they will be huge.I find it funny how people like you are saying this is media driven hysteria in terms of the virus, but you don't think all of your economic doom and gloom talk isn't the same thing? Again it's just a different hysteria and it's being driven by the right wing media.
Here's a fact....after every single "Worst economic disaster ever" we've come back. This will not be any different. It won't take decades, but it might take some time. It sucks, but we just passed a bill that extends unemployment benefits for 39 weeks, up from 27 weeks with an additonal $600 per check. Maybe we shouldn't have given tax cuts, rate cuts, corporate welfare and everything else in "the greatest economy ever" then we wouldn't have to add so much to the deficit so much. It would have been useful to have those tools to use right now, but they used them up when they didn't need to. The economy will turn for the next 6 months because of this stimulus. It won't turn like it was, but we were destined for a recession very soon before the outbreak.
Imagine getting a foothold on the virus, then opening up the country and going back to where we were or being worse off on the containment of the virus. What do you think that will do to the economy? IMO 1 prolonged shut down is much better than 3 shut downs of lesser time when the virus breaks out again. Until we can test 2 million people/day and contain those with the virus we should do what we are doing.
And BTW also in the stimulus is about 850 Billion to make sure people don't lose their jobs so companies can keep people on payroll. Why not ask the corps to lose some money over the next 6 months to keep people employeed instead of asking people to risk their lives.
And guess what, the “experts” who predicted millions of Americans would die from this are gonna keep their jobs NO MATTER WHAT. Can’t say the same for the people who suffered and lost their jobs bc of the hysteria caused by those predictions.You are correct. They approach this issue fro. THEIR level of expertise. Economists and other disciplines approach it from THEIR expertise.
POTUS takes all sources he regards or disregards, and makes the decision.
Emotionally, sure. And maybe we should get back to work soon, let's see what the numbers bear out once we have some reliable data and can start to determine which models we should be following from a policy perspective.My opinion wouldn’t change even if someone I knew died, we need to get back to work. If that sounds selfish, it’s not. I wouldn’t want or expect my friends and family to be out of work just because I succumbed to this virus, God forbid. A friend of mine died in a car accident years ago; I didn’t suddenly stop driving because of it.
All great points and i get it mane. No easy answers here.It took ten years to get out of the 1929 crash and depression. Very few had jobs a good percentage lost everything. This generation lost their phones and they would jump off of building never mind not having enough food. This stimulus is BS don't be fooled. It just puts more pressure on the younger people so we can live above our means. Don't be surprised if you see some inflation here, go back to work or pay the consequences and they will be huge.
One thing I always said about government, their wrong calls RARELY end in accountability and ALMOST NEVER result in termination.And guess what, the “experts” who predicted millions of Americans would die from this are gonna keep their jobs NO MATTER WHAT. Can’t say the same for the people who suffered and lost their jobs bc of the hysteria caused by those predictions.
What is your acceptable number of deaths?Ultimately, decisions have to made for the greater good. I have a 93 year old father-in-law and an 87 year old mother-in-law and both say this is not sustainable and we have to think of the long term consequences of a continued shut down. Even it means their health might be jeopardized.
I believe there are ways to open the economy back up and still be able to limit exposure to the virus. We won't be able to save everybody. That's a given. What we can do is our best to limit deaths.
One small example is many major retailers - including Lowes, Home Depot, Wal-Mart, Target - are installing plexi glass shields at all registers to limit exposure to both cashiers and customers. These are the types of things that can be implemented to mitigate exposure to the virus.
I'm very encouraged that companies large and small are implementing measures such as the aforementioned to help keep both customers and employees safe.
What if it wasn't an elderly loved one? Child, wife , brother or sister would that change your mind?Well said, Pop. An analogy to that is in the context of war. I come from a long line of military family. Just because a soldier is killed who happens to be someone close to us personally, while absolutely tragic, doesn't suddenly mean all affected families pull their support for the war.
Would I be sad if a loved one of mine passed due to coronavirus? Absolutely. Would that occurence therefore make me feel we need to lock down the country until a vaccine is out? No. And that's not because I enjoy watching elderly people die.
I've answered this sound bite attempt before, so I'll look it up and copy/paste....What is your acceptable number of deaths?