mdpcane
All-American
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2015
- Messages
- 9,010
Overtime was never necessary. I never watch a college overtime and I barely acknowledge the result. Overtime merely adds a blended aspect. Other than the long Tua touchdown pass against Georgia I can't think of a truly memorable play from a college overtime.
I can think of one.Overtime was never necessary. I never watch a college overtime and I barely acknowledge the result. Just think how Canes history would have changed if there had been overtime in 1983, 1987 and 1988. Those were all classic finishes, still remembered today and decades from now. Overtime merely adds a blended aspect. Other than the long Tua touchdown pass against Georgia I can't think of a truly memorable play from a college overtime.
don't ruin the best overtime in sports
Only the NCAA would take the best OT setup, look at it, and say "lets wreck it".
Overtime was never necessary. I never watch a college overtime and I barely acknowledge the result. Just think how Canes history would have changed if there had been overtime in 1983, 1987 and 1988. Those were all classic finishes, still remembered today and decades from now. Overtime merely adds a blended aspect. Other than the long Tua touchdown pass against Georgia I can't think of a truly memorable play from a college overtime.
The targeting proposal is fair, certainly an improvement. Every time I think the rule should be eliminated completely I see some rogue idiot who apparently hasn't been paying attention since the rule was adopted, nor the emphasis on safety. The bowl games were unbelievable with the number of aimed helmets toward defenseless players. College football is full of that type of defensive back, the ones who don't have good enough instincts to arrive a half second earlier. Not pro material but they think they have to uphold their reputation as a smacker.
More bad takes please.Overtime was never necessary. I never watch a college overtime and I barely acknowledge the result. Just think how Canes history would have changed if there had been overtime in 1983, 1987 and 1988. Those were all classic finishes, still remembered today and decades from now. Overtime merely adds a blended aspect. Other than the long Tua touchdown pass against Georgia I can't think of a truly memorable play from a college overtime.
The targeting proposal is fair, certainly an improvement. Every time I think the rule should be eliminated completely I see some rogue idiot who apparently hasn't been paying attention since the rule was adopted, nor the emphasis on safety. The bowl games were unbelievable with the number of aimed helmets toward defenseless players. College football is full of that type of defensive back, the ones who don't have good enough instincts to arrive a half second earlier. Not pro material but they think they have to uphold their reputation as a smacker.
Now that you bring it up... yes I thought I read here on CIS or elsewhere, that replay judging is in fact partially delegated to conference administrators outside the officiating crews. However, now I can't find anything on that on the net.Until fans learn the truth about how replay is executed, and more to the point WHO executes replay then no one will know anything about how college football is officiated.
Last year the Pac12 had to openly admit that they had university administrators deciding on football replay calls. There is zero doubt in my mind that the ACC does the same. I would simply like to know the truth. DOES THE ACC HAVE NON-FOOTBALL PEOPLE INVOLVED IN THE REPLAY PROCESS???
Inquiring minds want to know.
Until fans learn the truth about how replay is executed, and more to the point WHO executes replay then no one will know anything about how college football is officiated.
Last year the Pac12 had to openly admit that they had university administrators deciding on football replay calls. There is zero doubt in my mind that the ACC does the same. I would simply like to know the truth. DOES THE ACC HAVE NON-FOOTBALL PEOPLE INVOLVED IN THE REPLAY PROCESS???
Inquiring minds want to know.
Now that you bring it up... yes I thought I read here on CIS or elsewhere, that replay judging is in fact partially delegated to conference administrators outside the officiating crews. However, now I can't find anything on that on the net.
i called the ACC to get an answer to your question and i was told the Executive Associate Commissioner for the ACC , Amy Yakola will call me back on Monday with an answer.Until fans learn the truth about how replay is executed, and more to the point WHO executes replay then no one will know anything about how college football is officiated.
Last year the Pac12 had to openly admit that they had university administrators deciding on football replay calls. There is zero doubt in my mind that the ACC does the same. I would simply like to know the truth. DOES THE ACC HAVE NON-FOOTBALL PEOPLE INVOLVED IN THE REPLAY PROCESS???
Inquiring minds want to know.