Barry Jackson

ball915

All-American
Joined
Dec 21, 2012
Messages
5,794
### Besides excluding testimony of Kyle Wright, the NCAA informed UM that it will toss the testimony of Brodie Waters, the No. 2 official at Nevin Shapiro’s former sports agency, because part of it may have resulted from Sean Allen’s excluded testimony. Waters’ interview wasn’t believed to be horribly damaging.

Read more here: http://miamiherald.typepad.com/spor...atter-dolphins-canes-notes.html#storylink=cpy
 
Advertisement
38.jpg
 
Advertisement
I feel like 3 of their top 4 testimonies have been thrown out.

Really all that's left has to be Shapiro's self-corroboration bull****.
 
More to come:

Investigators withheld information about interviews with witness, misled the university and in some cases and lied to witnesses as an interview tactic to get information, by claiming that other people interviewed made comments they never made, in order to trick the subjects into revealing incriminating information they otherwise might not have gotten.

From the 45-page motion to the committee of infractions submitted by UM attorneys.
 
That's not anything new.

The question is, how will this be received by the COI? Do they want to hold the enforcement branch to a high standard of morality, or do they just want results by any means necessary, including underhanded tactics?
 
Falling apart by the seams

Yet they're stubbornly sticking to their guns when they could have just squashed the whole **** thing. I really want to sue these ******** after this is all done and over with. They have already had us on probatiion for 2 years.
 
Advertisement
When Shapiro says something twice, that just means he lied two times.

I'm waiting for them to throw out his testimony because he recently said he purposely withheld information on Kyle Wright because he felt he got a bad deal at Miami.

If he withheld information on Wright, basically lied about Wright, then who's to say he didn't lie about EVERYTHING else.
 
You guys just don't get it.

This is all about appearances. The NCAA never even considered tossing this case. They can't. It would end them. They must throw whatever is left of their case before the judge (COI) and get a decision. That way, they can maintain appearances of validity. If they dismissed just because UM poked holes in their case, every subsequent investigation would receive the same response. Chaos would reign. They can't run scared in a case that Yahoo blew up nationally or they'd look like even bigger fools than they do now. Its all about appearances.

Oh, and last I checked, UM did, in fact, commit violations. It is the COI's job to determine if the self-imposed penalties fit the crime and pass judgment.

Likewise, UM's motion to dismiss never was expected to be granted. That big fat pile of paper was nothing more than UM's best shot to educate the COI. And it was brilliant. The COI assigned one person to be judge and that person ruled that the MTD must be ruled upon by the entire committee. Translation? EVERYONE GETS TO READ IT!!!!!!! And that is spectacular news for UM.

Patience, we'll be fine.


Falling apart by the seams

Yet they're stubbornly sticking to their guns when they could have just squashed the whole **** thing. I really want to sue these ******** after this is all done and over with. They have already had us on probatiion for 2 years.
 
Advertisement
Just dropped by to say the I hate the NCAA and Mark Emmert looks like a douche bag.
 
You guys just don't get it.

This is all about appearances. The NCAA never even considered tossing this case. They can't. It would end them. They must throw whatever is left of their case before the judge (COI) and get a decision. That way, they can maintain appearances of validity. If they dismissed just because UM poked holes in their case, every subsequent investigation would receive the same response. Chaos would reign. They can't run scared in a case that Yahoo blew up nationally or they'd look like even bigger fools than they do now. Its all about appearances.

Oh, and last I checked, UM did, in fact, commit violations. It is the COI's job to determine if the self-imposed penalties fit the crime and pass judgment.

Likewise, UM's motion to dismiss never was expected to be granted. That big fat pile of paper was nothing more than UM's best shot to educate the COI. And it was brilliant. The COI assigned one person to be judge and that person ruled that the MTD must be ruled upon by the entire committee. Translation? EVERYONE GETS TO READ IT!!!!!!! And that is spectacular news for UM.

Patience, we'll be fine.


Falling apart by the seams

Yet they're stubbornly sticking to their guns when they could have just squashed the whole **** thing. I really want to sue these ******** after this is all done and over with. They have already had us on probatiion for 2 years.


Truth.
 
You guys just don't get it.

This is all about appearances. The NCAA never even considered tossing this case. They can't. It would end them. They must throw whatever is left of their case before the judge (COI) and get a decision. That way, they can maintain appearances of validity. If they dismissed just because UM poked holes in their case, every subsequent investigation would receive the same response. Chaos would reign. They can't run scared in a case that Yahoo blew up nationally or they'd look like even bigger fools than they do now. Its all about appearances.

Oh, and last I checked, UM did, in fact, commit violations. It is the COI's job to determine if the self-imposed penalties fit the crime and pass judgment.

Likewise, UM's motion to dismiss never was expected to be granted. That big fat pile of paper was nothing more than UM's best shot to educate the COI. And it was brilliant. The COI assigned one person to be judge and that person ruled that the MTD must be ruled upon by the entire committee. Translation? EVERYONE GETS TO READ IT!!!!!!! And that is spectacular news for UM.

Patience, we'll be fine.


Falling apart by the seams

Yet they're stubbornly sticking to their guns when they could have just squashed the whole **** thing. I really want to sue these ******** after this is all done and over with. They have already had us on probatiion for 2 years.

+1 to this.
 
Advertisement
I am sure they are cleaning up the small crap and leaking it daily getting UMs fan base and Alumni hopes up....do they still have damning evidence?? I don't trust them one bit...they were boxed in a corner by their own undoing, that usually leads to bad things for someone
 
You guys just don't get it.

This is all about appearances. The NCAA never even considered tossing this case. They can't. It would end them. They must throw whatever is left of their case before the judge (COI) and get a decision. That way, they can maintain appearances of validity. If they dismissed just because UM poked holes in their case, every subsequent investigation would receive the same response. Chaos would reign. They can't run scared in a case that Yahoo blew up nationally or they'd look like even bigger fools than they do now. Its all about appearances.

Oh, and last I checked, UM did, in fact, commit violations. It is the COI's job to determine if the self-imposed penalties fit the crime and pass judgment.

Likewise, UM's motion to dismiss never was expected to be granted. That big fat pile of paper was nothing more than UM's best shot to educate the COI. And it was brilliant. The COI assigned one person to be judge and that person ruled that the MTD must be ruled upon by the entire committee. Translation? EVERYONE GETS TO READ IT!!!!!!! And that is spectacular news for UM.

Patience, we'll be fine.


Falling apart by the seams

Yet they're stubbornly sticking to their guns when they could have just squashed the whole **** thing. I really want to sue these ******** after this is all done and over with. They have already had us on probatiion for 2 years.

Brilliantly said. It's a process and positioning issue.
 
You guys just don't get it.

This is all about appearances. The NCAA never even considered tossing this case. They can't. It would end them. They must throw whatever is left of their case before the judge (COI) and get a decision. That way, they can maintain appearances of validity. If they dismissed just because UM poked holes in their case, every subsequent investigation would receive the same response. Chaos would reign. They can't run scared in a case that Yahoo blew up nationally or they'd look like even bigger fools than they do now. Its all about appearances.

Oh, and last I checked, UM did, in fact, commit violations. It is the COI's job to determine if the self-imposed penalties fit the crime and pass judgment.

Likewise, UM's motion to dismiss never was expected to be granted. That big fat pile of paper was nothing more than UM's best shot to educate the COI. And it was brilliant. The COI assigned one person to be judge and that person ruled that the MTD must be ruled upon by the entire committee. Translation? EVERYONE GETS TO READ IT!!!!!!! And that is spectacular news for UM.

Patience, we'll be fine.


Falling apart by the seams

Yet they're stubbornly sticking to their guns when they could have just squashed the whole **** thing. I really want to sue these ******** after this is all done and over with. They have already had us on probatiion for 2 years.

Baldychutes is spot on.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top