Search results

Wow. Now that's what I call escalation... Don't anyone get the wrong idea, I've got peace and love for everyone.

We've heard you are pretty good on defense... ;)

Holy ****, I just saw Halley's Comet AND a good post from you...

Holy ****, it's like that part in the Marvel movie where the superhero reveals a new, as yet unseen, superpower...

Yep, you and I are in agreement. But I also freely admit to having a dim view of the ratings services. Even if they are right more often than they are wrong. I still think it's because they copy off of Saban's exam answer sheet, and not because they are independently brilliant. And Dabo's...

I'll just say this. Calling the rankings "corrupt" might be a bit much. But they ARE subject to lobbying and manipulation. You and I have seen the Gaytors fans HARASS the 247/Rivals guys into giving THEIR RECRUITS the "Gaytor Bumpz". In the end, some of this is self-fulfilling. There ARE...

Oh ****, 423 stepped in that one! Just kidding, much love all around for the use (and joke) of "plethora".

Man, you just hit a grand slam off the Durham bull. Bravo.

Yes. Just pointing out that "interest" and "timing" are two completely different issues.

So when there is actually a quiet recruitment, people need to invent fictitious problems and claim "the juice isn't worth the squeeze"? We have some true conspiracy nuts on this website. Grow up and stop looking for monsters under your bed.

I'll just say this. I think the order of events is important. We are currently taking some 3-star guys, yes, but while we still feel VERY good about some blue-chip guys who are coming in for OVs. I feel like PAST 3-star takes WERE "covers" because we took them after knowing all the...

Don't be mad. I just demolished your terrible argument with one big shot, instead of a bunch of small ones.

Absolutely do have evidence. For instance, we see recruit after recruit having NO RANKING, and then suddenly they get a 3 or 4 star evaluation five minutes after a top program offers them. Again, the resources that P5 schools currently have DWARF that of the diluted "national services", which...

Some smart guy said "Do we need some "outcomes" and some wins to validate the new approach? Sure." But by all means, keep moping. As for the national rankings geting "more accurate every year", that's just bull****. There were CONSTANT complaints about on3 (and by extension, the composite)...

See if you can find a streaming provider that will give you BOTH ACC and ACCX. For instance, through Xfiniti, I only get the first channel. Apologies if I can't remember the names, but I think there were streaming packages with some/all of these: DirecTV, Dish, Yahoo, YouTube, Sling, Hulu...

My TiVo has it coming up on delay, a Sunday or Monday airing, I believe. And people wonder why I hate the ACC and the ACC Network.

As for your last paragraph, there's no need to choose between two poisons. No need to worship "national rankings" that are actually based on the "evaluators" from certain key geographic regions, and the biased writers who devote all of their coverage and saliva to the recruits at the SEC/Big 10...

**** the industry. I don't care. The kid still moved up. What's more ridiculous is how the Elite 11 FINAL SCORES are based 50% on high school numbers. Which are only current up through the junior year. Makes sense. Get a bunch of QBs in the same place in order to measure them against each...

Do I think that QUARTERBACKS from rural areas have a shot to climb 600 spots once they get attention and/or camps and/or Elite 11 attention? Yes. Yes I do. Are we supposed to lock in "the best QBs in the country" by their junior seasons and then refuse to consider any other evidence? That's...

Go **** off. We are flipping Smith. You wanna save receipts, that's on you. "Don't think about it too much". What a puzzy-*** comment. Some of our fans have the softest shoulders in the entire country. Waaaaaah, let's give up on recruiting guys in our own backyard 9 months early because...