Search results

Could you read it that he's embarrassed by the play of the S or CBs or both, which contradicts Baker's statement that the S were good? Believe me, I don't like this any more than you do. LOL. I will now insert an emoji to describe how I'm feeling about parsing Ed's emoji. I ask for your...

Unfortunately, if a legendary S and part-time staff member responds to the DC's tweet about the secondary with an embarrassed face, it means something.

Our arrangement with him is incredibly odd to say the least. He's a part-time employee. No idea how much he's around or how much time he dedicates to duties here or splits his time between shilling and UM.

Is that what that emoji means? Agreement? I have honestly no idea.

This is exactly why grown men shouldn't speak in emoji. There are already 20 different interpretations on here as to what he meant when he could have just said what he meant in a single sentence. If the emoji is an embarrassed face he should say what he's embarrassed about or who is...

It's cryptic in that it could apply to the CBs or S or both. I'm a fan of just saying what you mean instead of expressing yourself like a 13 year old girl with hieroglyphics. I appreciate Ed's attempt at being demanding, but a little red cartoon face falls a bit short.

I agree with saying what you mean, but maybe he's speaking 18 year old by using the emoji. Maybe that stupid face speaks more loudly to the players than words.

This program needs a little more bad guy demandingness from leadership spots. I hope Ed doesn’t get the boot for being that guy. Maybe it’s even orchestrated good cop/bad cop.