Search results

I thought Mr. Owl just says “who?” ‘til next time…my entertainment is here.

I didn’t think that when I read your post though.

That‘s exactly what I expect someone to say when they have a laser-thin argument.

What have they done in the last few years. Go back 5...

I’ve watched top SEC teams play Vandy…sometimes they hold their own. Vandy is a bad example because they’re just there to collect an SEC TV check. The hardest job in P-5 is the Vandy Job. The talent gap is huge (and don’t use Duke…the 2Nd/3rd most talented team in the ACC has lost to Duke 2...

Let me say it again. All of those teams that you mention, would swap their schedules in a second with whatever you consider to be the toughest ACC schedule, and every ACC team including Clemson would sheepishly say, “I’m good!” “I don’t know what he’s talking about.” Auburn and Florida and...

Fan of good football. Which is more consistently than not played in the SEC. Only the delusional believe that the ACC is on par - in any way - with the SEC.

They’re average for the SEC, but they’re better than most of the teams in college football. aTm? Would destroy the ACC. Auburn? Would destroy the ACC. Kentucky is even built to destroy the ACC. Playing top OOC games is often a function of economics…they can usually fill a large stadium and stack...

1. Clemson would have a chance, but there is zero guarantee that Clemson could win the SEC East, much less the conference. 2. uhm no. Louisville was destroyed by Miami last year and VT was spotted how many before Miami caught them -and then gave the game away? These teams, playing for and...

It’s wider. Interconference play doesn’t tell the whole story. Put Louisville or VT in the SEC and they finish at the bottom. Same goes for UNC. IIT would get destroyed in the SEC.