Search results

Can we rename striker to rover, star, or money to appease CIS posters?

Someone other than Blake Baker calls the defense Or he takes on more of Manny’s style than whatever he has done the last 2 years

Facts. We’re on the right track on D but missing the basic philosophical football stuff. Need an old school smash mouth football coach to come in and make tweaks to what manny already does. Instill some gap integrity in our run D and some overall discipline in our blitz and zone coverages...

Ya I knew better. Lol

End of the season Alabama would score 50 on anyone

I know Macho has been critical of the scheme and he’s right. But the people that hate the striker but want us to play a defense that uses star, rover, money, nickel, joker, etc whatever you want to call it are the ones that post the most. Macho actually brings useful reasoning.

We’ll revamp it and call it “money” backer and it will be badass again. But they’ll do the exact same thing

I’ve been one of the biggest advocates all year saying this isn’t the same as what Manny ran as DC. It’s similar but there’s not nearly as much pressure or man coverage. A lot more stunts and “exotic” looks. We go through a stint every game where we run what we used to and it looks good. Just...

It kind of lost its mystique the last 3 years. It was fun as **** when we were whipping ND and VT and forcing a **** ton of turnovers. The 7-6, 6-7, and then the lack of turnovers this year just kinda ruined it.

Lol The football illiterate are always the ones that complain about the scheme the most.