Search results

  1. IndayArtHauz

    Ed Reed tweet

    On to Louisville!
  2. IndayArtHauz

    Ed Reed tweet

    You could. You could interpret it to mean he’s embarrassed by Christy’s reporting, or just the safeties. It’s impossible to say for certain, which means it’s definitely about Baker being a fraud.
  3. IndayArtHauz

    Ed Reed tweet

    No, it means blushing or embarrassment. If you’re a poster who thinks Ed secretly wants Baker fired then you could read it as he’s embarrassed by Baker. If you’re not you could read it as he’s agreeing with Baker and blushing at the comment/reality of the statement. I can’t believe this is how...
  4. IndayArtHauz

    Ed Reed tweet

    How can you infer that’s what Reed means from an emoji that looks like he supports what Baker said?
  5. IndayArtHauz

    Ed Reed tweet

    Someone texted it to me when it happened to laugh at some fan pretending Ed was attacking Baker. I still do not understand what people are seeing in this emoji. It’s not even a 😤 or 😡, which still without context don’t mean anything.
  6. IndayArtHauz

    Ed Reed tweet

    I fail to understand what is controversial about his use of an emoji. Baker (kinda) called out the CBs, which I appreciated, and praised the safeties. Ed blushed, what on earth is the issue? If anyone Baker stepped up, and Ed merely reacted. What am I missing?
Back
Top